.jpg)
.jpg)
Significant Cases
- Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Galafassi v Kelly AUSTRALIA
- Taheri v Vitek AUSTRALIA
- Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Karamihos AUSTRALIA
- First Mortgage Managed Investments Pty Limited v Pittman AUSTRALIA
- Clark v Macourt AUSTRALIA
- MacKinlay v Derry Dew Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty Ltd v Five Star Lamb Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Neale v Ancher Mortlock & Woolley Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
Law Resources
- Intellectual Property Office of Malaysia
- IP Agents Good Conduct Guidelines
- Intellectual Property Office of Singapore: Legal Decisions
- ASEAN - Trade Mark Class - Online Search
- Federal Court
- Industrial Court
- Bar Council Malaysia
- KL Regional Centre for Arbitration
- Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
- Companies Commission
- Securities Commission
- Malaysia Goods & Services Tax (GST)
- Personal Data Protection
Legal News
- Huckle gets 22 life sentences
- Sarawak BN won't support Hadi's Bill
- 'Hudud is about votes'
- Why all the brouhaha over the EPF's new policy?
- EPF's new deal
- MB: Muslims can't sell food before 3pm
- Vehicle Entry Permit System begins trial run
- Ire over Syariah complex delay
- Kuwait jails three royals for insulting emir
- Sedition conviction against Karpal upheld
- I'll quit too, says Subra
Case Highlights
KHURSHEED AHMAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
"...what was protected under Article 25 was the religious faith and not a practice which may run counter to public order, health or morality. Polygamy was not integral part of religion and monogamy was a reform within the power of the State under Article 25. This Court upheld the views of the Bombay, Gujarat and Allahabad High Courts to this effect. This Court also upheld the view of the Allahabad High Court upholding such a conduct rule. It was observed that a practice did not acquire sanction of religion simply because it was permitted. Such a practice could be regulated by law without violating Article 25..."...
Article Highlights
Employment
First appellate court case on meaning of 'public interest' in context of whistleblowing ...
Do you want to see more?
