.jpg)
.jpg)
Burberry, Louis Vuitton lose appeal in trademark dispute against freight forwarder Megastar
Burberry and Louis Vuitton have lost their appeal in the Supreme Court of Singapore in a trademark dispute against a local shipping company.
Significant Cases
- Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Galafassi v Kelly AUSTRALIA
- Taheri v Vitek AUSTRALIA
- Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Karamihos AUSTRALIA
- First Mortgage Managed Investments Pty Limited v Pittman AUSTRALIA
- Clark v Macourt AUSTRALIA
- MacKinlay v Derry Dew Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Cedar Meats (Aust) Pty Ltd v Five Star Lamb Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
- Neale v Ancher Mortlock & Woolley Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA
Law Resources
- Intellectual Property Office of Malaysia
- IP Agents Good Conduct Guidelines
- Intellectual Property Office of Singapore: Legal Decisions
- ASEAN - Trade Mark Class - Online Search
- Federal Court
- Industrial Court
- Bar Council Malaysia
- KL Regional Centre for Arbitration
- Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
- Companies Commission
- Securities Commission
- Malaysia Goods & Services Tax (GST)
- Personal Data Protection
Legal News
- Cousin claims saw photo of Altantuya with Razak Baginda and a DPM 1/24/2019
- Cadet bullying death: 'I saw accused holding steam iron' 1/24/2019
- Huawei executive has strong case to fight extradition - Canadian envoy 1/24/2019
- Robbery suspect caught after car plunges into river 1/24/2019
- Irish tourist disappears without trace in KL; now missing for almost a month 1/24/2019
- Rulers arrive for Conference of Rulers special meeting 1/24/2019
- (Video) Drunk Russian detained after failed attempt to hijack plane 1/24/2019
- International cooperation vital in fight against corruption: Dr M 1/23/2019
- Son of SSM top management employee hands documents to MACC 1/23/2019
- Police arrest two couples found packaging drugs 1/23/2019
- Cop under investigation for sexual assault 1/23/2019
- Jia Zong wants ministry to probe missing funds of several SJKC (Updated) 1/23/2019
- Penang Bridge crash: Victim’s body still intact after 3 days 1/23/2019
- Moey family urges public to leave them alone and stop speculating 1/23/2019
- EC powers limited when it comes to investigations, arrests 1/22/2019
Case Highlights
SEADRILL GHANA OPERATIONS LIMITED v. TULLOW GHANA LIMITED
ENGLAND AND WALES HIGH COURT
Drilling for oil is a risky business. Oil companies seek to protect themselves against the financial consequences of risk by appropriate clauses in their contracts, for example, by a force majeure clause. This case concerns a contract for the hire of an ex pensive oil rig which contained such a clause. During the course of a territorial sea dispute between neighbouring states the arbitration tribunal determining that dispute required drilling to cease in the disputed sea where drilling was to take place....
Article Highlights
Burberry and Louis Vuitton lose counterfeiting case in Singapore
Malaysian sukuk: A superior alternative to traditional bonds
Investors, regardless of faith, continue to embrace Sukuk
The world’s first sukuk inaugurated in Malaysia back in 1990, when Shell MDS (M) Sdn Bhd launched a US$125 million (RM525 million) issue in ringgit. Since then, the popularity of sukuk, which are non-interest bearing, Shariah-compliant fixed income instruments, has gone from strength to strength, especially in Malaysia.
For years, sukuk have seen high demand from Islamic investors as well as conventional ones in Malaysia, where many regard this asset class as a superior alternative to traditional bonds.
Do you want to see more?
